Repository navigation
Conversation
litiliu
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 19, 2026 07:20
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of the change
This pull request fixes FLINK-40384 by preventing periodic
FlinkStateSnapshothistory cleanup from deleting snapshot resources that are still active or have not initialized their status yet.Previously, snapshots with a null status or in
TRIGGER_PENDING/IN_PROGRESSstate could be selected for cleanup. Deleting such snapshots can race with status reconciliation, resulting in Kubernetes409 Conflicterrors and repeatedSavepointErrorevents. With this change, only snapshots in terminal states are eligible for cleanup.Brief change log
FlinkStateSnapshotcleanup to the terminal statesCOMPLETED,FAILED, andABANDONED.TRIGGER_PENDING/IN_PROGRESSstate.Verifying this change
This change added tests and was verified as follows:
SnapshotObserverTest; all 11 tests passed:mvn -pl flink-kubernetes-operator -am -Dtest=SnapshotObserverTest -Dsurefire.failIfNoSpecifiedTests=false testgit diff --checkpasses.Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
CustomResourceDescriptors: noDocumentation
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: OpenAI Codex Reviewed by human and verified on k8s cluster.