Issue Source: http://github.com/bugmark-trial/trader1/issues/313
Confusion: Payout resolution to a different person than Funder OR Worker.
My first guess was that it’s because Don resold their part and since the issue didn’t get resolved they are seen as the last funder, thus they get the payout? However; a) The issue did get resolved, therefore the worker should have received the payout (Pull123).
b) This situation creates multiple funders. If it gets resolved this way, the worker turned funder will always win; if it does resolve they get paid, if it doesn’t resolve they get paid as well. Regardless, information should be provided on which funder gets pay-out when the issue is closed; the original funder as listed under funder, or the last funder as listed under worker (person who is reselling their work).
Issue Source: http://github.com/bugmark-trial/trader1/issues/313
Confusion: Payout resolution to a different person than Funder OR Worker.
My first guess was that it’s because Don resold their part and since the issue didn’t get resolved they are seen as the last funder, thus they get the payout? However; a) The issue did get resolved, therefore the worker should have received the payout (Pull123).
b) This situation creates multiple funders. If it gets resolved this way, the worker turned funder will always win; if it does resolve they get paid, if it doesn’t resolve they get paid as well. Regardless, information should be provided on which funder gets pay-out when the issue is closed; the original funder as listed under funder, or the last funder as listed under worker (person who is reselling their work).