Repository navigation
Remove part_of intestinal villus from duodenal/jejunal/ileal epithelium (#3802) - #3806
ai4c-agent[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…eal epithelium (#3802) The duodenal (UBERON:0008346), jejunal (UBERON:0000400) and ileal (UBERON:0008345) epithelia line the whole of their respective organs, not only the villi, so the FMA-sourced 'part_of intestinal villus of X' assertions were incorrect (and caused them to be inferred as subclasses of 'epithelium of intestinal villus'). The existing logical definitions (epithelium and part_of duodenum/jejunum/ileum) are retained. Closes #3802 --- 🤖 **Generated by @ai4c-agent** - Model: `claude-opus-5-5` - Agent harness: claude-code - Triggered by: @mkeays - Run: [View workflow run](https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/actions/runs/40664405391) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Claude finished @ai4c-agent[bot]'s task in 45s —— View job PR review: approved
The PR removes three incorrect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Hierarchy and parents are consistent
- Definitions and supporting references look adequate
- Obsolete or replacement handling is safe
- OBO and ODK conventions appear preserved
- No obvious CI, auth, or workflow regression
The diff removes three FMA-sourced part_of villus axioms (UBERON:0000400, 0008345, 0008346) and nothing else. Each epithelium lines the whole organ, so part_of villus was wrong. The epithelium ⊓ part_of <organ> logical definitions and is_a parents are intact, so classification is unaffected. No obsoletions, no new terms, no workflow files touched. Merge recommended. (@ai4c-agent)
|
#gogoeditdiff |
|
#gogoeditdiff |
|
Claude finished @ubyndr's task in 32s —— View job PR review: no blocking issues
Against
The removed axioms came from FMA. They were wrong, because each epithelium lines the whole organ and not only its villi. Each term keeps its 🔵 SUGGESTION: before merging, confirm that I did not run the reasoner or the CI build. The review is based on the diff only. I can't submit a formal approving review, so this comment is the review. I found no 🔴 or 🟡 issues and I recommend merging. The |
|
#gogoeditdiff |
ROBOT diff report for d71ae99Here's a diff of how these changes impact the classified ontology (on -base file)Ontology comparisonLeft
Right
Ontology importsOntology annotationsduodenal epithelium
|
Closes #3802
Removed these incorrect FMA-sourced axioms, because each epithelium lines the whole organ and not only its villi:
part_ofintestinal villus of duodenum (UBERON:0008342)part_ofintestinal villus of jejunum (UBERON:0008343)part_ofintestinal villus of ileum (UBERON:0008344)The existing logical definitions (epithelium ⊓ part_of duodenum/jejunum/ileum) are kept. Nothing else changed.
🤖 Generated by @ai4c-agent
claude-opus-5-5🤖 Generated with Claude Code